AppRemover fully supports the thorough uninstallation of hundreds of antivirus and antispyware applications. The following support chart is updated with each new release. The chart lists two different types of supported applications. One set has been verified by OPSWAT Labs testing. The other set lists applications that have been reported as supported by the hundreds of thousands of users that have previously downloaded AppRemover. After using AppRemover, please take a moment to answer a few brief questions about the product. Your feedback will greatly improve AppRemover's effectiveness.
In addition, AppRemover may be able to successfully remove other security applications on your system. However, these are not guaranteed. Use AppRemover:. When replacing one security application with another. When competing security applications tie up your computer. When the application's built-in uninstall process fails. When you have forgotten the application password Version History for AppRemover.
Appremover Windows 10
Introduction If you often find that you create duplicate files as you rename or use files in another context, or just backup more than you had intended, Duplicate File Detectors help you find and/or delete these duplicates and regain the storage space they previously occupied. Judging from some of the recent comments, it would appear that some cautions should be noted before using this type of software. One might also note that with the cost per gigabyte rapidly decreasing, redundancy is no longer such a bad thing. Don't ever just blindly run the program, find all the duplicates and then click 'remove'. This can be disastrous in the sense that even though filenames are the same, the content is sometimes different. For example, you may have multiple icons with the same name, but of differing sizes; or you may have a photograph that has been modified when placed in a different folder but retains the same filename.
Don't scan too much at once. A complete scan of drive C: would not be smart. However, scanning a few related folders at one time is much more efficient and the results less overwhelming. Despite the best software, human intelligence may still have to be used. It is best, like eating an elephant, to take one bite or one small scan at a time. Rated Products.
Incorporated other software you may not need such as BoostSpeed. Other Duplicate File Removers. is fast and easy to use.
It also features two specialty searches: Graphics and music. However, these functions are now limited in the free version. is fast and easy to use, does a credible job and it has enough options to satisfy most users. is fast and easy to use and does a credible job and it has enough options to satisfy most users. is yet another option.
It is fast and easy to use, does a credible job and it has plenty of options. Editor This software category is in need of an editor. If you would like to give something back to the freeware community by taking it over, check out for more details. You can then contact us from that page.
Please rate this article. Pictures is the only thing I do not use searchmyfiles for. I use VisiPics that compares the pictures visually too and has a slider to adjust how much the searcher should be strict or loose about his choices, that can range from choosing pictures that have a lot of the same background color (like all pictures that have a lot of white or a lot of black) to pictures that must be completely identical with each other. Recolored pictures can be found as duplicates too. Playing with the slider needs a bit of testing, but it is the best program I know of. Search my files lack a simple but useful function - to search files in the same name, or same size, etc. It more focus on content comparison, maybe based on MD5 indexing first.
However, sometimes two txt document are almost same, 1 emtpy line would create different md5. Duplicate cleaner free and double killer supports name and size match. Glary utilities also has duplicate clean function, however, I am not sure it does content check.
Of course, we can do a standard search using search my files, then sort the list by name or size to find the similar files, apparently it is awkward. I used to use double killer till it started to have problem with my vista. It is a nice one but as the development stops at 2007, I am not sure it works with win7 and later windows, especially 64 bit system.
Download.com indicates it supports up to vista, while softonic thinks it supports up to xp. Although this category title focuses on the.removal. of duplicate files, the current reviews would be better described as being for a Duplicate File 'Finder' category. Each review should focus seriously on the removal process, since that is by far the most time-consuming for users' hands-on efforts.
In comments for a related article ('A Duplicate File Finder That's Simple To Use And Unbelievably Fast'), Century22 and 11bravo pointed out what may be the single most important feature to anyone facing a large number of duplicates: an automated way to protect from deletion one file in each group of duplicates and then to choose between quick, batch deletion of all duplicates that weren't so protected versus manual deletion of selected duplicates. Note that I'm referring only to true duplicates, for which the minimum requirement is that files be identical in content; it would be desirable to have the added option to require duplication in data such as date and name and perhaps other attributes.
Without this combination of automated protection and batch deletion, the user is faced with doing that manually for each group of duplicates, which could take countless hours with a large number of duplicates. The next editor for this software category would do well to add to each program's review a statement of whether the program offers such an automated deletion-with-protection feature, or requires manual selection of each deletion, which is probably more error-prone than a well-designed automated method. Anti-Twin turned out to be what I was looking for. Duplicate Cleaner Free and Auslogics wouldn't do networked drives. I'm not looking to compare audio, video, or family pics. I'm looking to get rid of the 400 copies of plain, old documents that have been created all across my network. Aaliyah are you that somebody download free mp3. We'd been trading core files around with a USB drive.
Now we've got a NAS and everybody has their own private copy of every file from the past three years plus their own stuff that all needs to be merged back onto the NAS. I'm OCD, but that's tedious even for me! Pros for Anti-Twin: Works on networked drives Compares by name, content, size, or date or a combination of these Allows a% match. DCF didn't recognize a lot of these files as duplicates because several have been re-saved with nothing more than a carriage-return or a blank space difference. I don't care!
Same date, same file name, same basic file size, same file for my purposes. Clearly lists all duplicates in matched groups showing file path/name, date, and size. Allows deletion by directory! After it finds the duplicates, I can check a single folder (like one of the many copies) and it will delete from the copy and leave my original alone. Interface is clean and user-friendly.
I was up and running within minutes, maybe even seconds. Intuitive checkboxes. Thank you for this listing of duplicate finding programs, and especially for linking to Anti-Twin.
I've spent many blurry-eyed hours comparing files. Now I may actually get this project done before my next birthday. Who is rating those tools? I am amazed that SearchMyFiles has 5 stars with that unusable ugly interface.
I tried all those tools and I can say that the best in this list is 'Fast Duplicate File Finder'. It is completely free for '100% Identical files' and 'Similar File Names' modes. Actually I do not see even 'Similar File Names' mode in the other tools - this is very hand if you have My CV.doc, My Cv (1).doc, My Cv 2013.doc named files which is quite common situation. Yes FDFF has some small limitations in the free version - the mode for finding files with similar (not duplicate) content lists just 10 groups (which is even usable), but for the average user like me the free version is more than sufficient. I love Gizmo's freeware, but in my opinion this article is not objective and requires revising. Thank you for the great site though.
I just noticed that your version is also outdated - the latest version is 3.7.0.1. I think there is an important item being overlooked in the comparision. Won't affect the selection of Best in Class though. I'm using Windows 7 64bit, and NAS4Free on a Microserver on the home network.
I have a lot of files strewn across USB hard drive. A recent external drive failure caused me to get a NAS solution. So this duplicate file finder mechanism is really important for home use with the amount of digital information normal families accumulate. Well, neither 'Duplicate Cleaner Free' or 'Auslogics Duplicate File Finder' will touch the windows share from my NAS server. 'SearchMyFiles' performs flawlessly.
So could TSA add network share capable as part of it's tests please. Thanks for the awesome work, and awesome site.
Apple's iOS 9 will ask users if they want to delete apps to make room for the upgrade if their devices are short of space, then automatically select those marked for temporary elimination, according to online reports. The new feature, revealed yesterday by several users of the iOS 9 preview now in developers' hands, was another piece in a plan by Apple to avoid repeating the debacle of last year, when owners of iPhones and iPads with small storage allotments were unable to easily install iOS 8. Some had to laboriously remove apps or purge photo and music collections to free up enough room for iOS 8. Kaleb Butt iOS 9 includes several space-saving features to make sure customers with a small amount of storage - like a 16GB iPhone 6 - will be able to install the upgrade, including a just-revealed option to automatically delete apps. Earlier this month, Apple said that it had required to install iOS 9, from the 4.6GB for last year's upgrade to 1.8GB this fall, when the new operating system releases.
Apple has also debuted a multi-part technology dubbed essentially a way for third-party developers to optimize app installation delivery and processing for the storage space on the destination device. An iPhone with just 16GB of space, for instance, would be treated differently than one with 128GB. The app deletion option was noticed by several users of the iOS 9 preview, including 16-year-old iOS developer Kaleb Butt of Vancouver, B.C., who of the deletion notification.
'Insufficient Space for Download,' the pop-up stated. 'In order to make room for the software update, some apps will need to be temporarily deleted. All deleted apps will automatically be replaced after the update is complete.' Apple issued a second iOS 9 beta on Tuesday, as well as a, aka El Capitan. Typically, OS upgrades require more space to install than they eventually occupy, thanks to their need to unpack compressed files - much too large to hold in memory - before beginning the process. Upgrades also create large temporary files, also written to storage, that contain copies of the individual components of the to-be-upgraded OS. That ensures a working device if the upgrade fails for some reason, as the originals can then be put back into place as part of a roll-back.
Download App Remover Portable Garage Door Opener
After a successful upgrade, the temporary files are automatically deleted, freeing up space. It was unclear from Butt's tweet, and numerous follow-ups by others, how Apple chooses the apps to delete and later reinstall, whether it takes a hands-off approach to apps that store data locally, and if not, what happens to the data. Some of the retweets and replies to Butt's tweet wondered why Apple went to such lengths when it should, in their opinion, simply stop selling devices with smaller amounts of storage. 'Such tricks would not be needed if base iPhones were 32GB,' Herid Fan.
That, however, would go against Apple's grain and sales model: Historically, the company starts all its device lines at a smaller storage allotment, then prices models with more space higher in the expectation that most users will opt to pay a bit more to get more. And then there are the corollaries to Parkinson's law - the one that says, 'work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion' - which claim that data expands to fill the available storage space, and offshoots that argue a family's possessions expand to fill the garage.
Apple has not said exactly when it will release iOS 9, admitting only that it would be this fall. The last three years, Apple delivered a new iOS on the Wednesday nearest the middle of September. If it followed that schedule this year, Apple would ship iOS 9 on Sept.